Macbeth, my favourite of Shakespeare’s plays and the one where I feel I haven’t seen a truly memorable production yet.
I have been looking forward to seeing this production even though the reviews in the papers haven’t been all that great; I like Polly Findlay as a director, I think Christopher Eccleston is an interesting actor and I’ve only ever seen Niamh Cusack in a read-through production before.
On the whole the stage set worked well. It was adaptable and not too faffy. I found the clock counting down the minutes of Macbeth’s reign a bit distracting but I really liked the Porter resetting it at the end. I found the overhead, behind-the-perspex bit of the set way too distracting. A couple of times I noticed that I’d missed bits because I was trying to work out who was up there and what was happening. I feel this bit needs to be more static.
One thing I wasn’t looking forward to, having read a coupe of reviews, was the fact that Findlay has done quite a lot of playing around with the text. As someone who knows the text reasonably well I though it might be distracting when familiar lines didn’t follow on from each other. It wasn’t and I stopped noticing very quickly as I was drawn into the action.
Christopher Eccleston made a good Macbeth. He was credible as soldier, insecure King and madman. The only bit that didn’t work for me was the invisible dagger scene where I didn’t feel Macbeth was shocked to see this dagger floating in midair.
Despite the reviews, I thought Niamh Cusack was a good Lady Macbeth; an ambitious woman who wants the status promised by the weird sisters and is prepared to take the necessary steps to achieve her ends. I thought Cusack did a good job of showing what happens to people who are too shallow to consider the consequences of their ambition and who end up falling to pieces.
That said, I didn’t think Eccleston and Cusack were particularly believable as a couple, let alone a couple who love are supposed to love each other.
It was an interesting idea to use children to play the Weird Sisters/Witches. They looked innocent and harmless and yet, with the way they played with their dolls, they were creepy; almost like the children in horror stories who turn out to be psychopathic mass murderers! Again, one slight distraction in that towards the end of the play, one of the girls was losing her slipper sock and I was distracted by the thought she might slip and hurt herself. It sounds silly but costumes really shouldn’t be a distraction to the audience.
Michael Hodgson did a great job as a creepy Porter/Satan. He was on stage all the way through the play, keeping tally of the murders and marking the countdown to Macbeth’s fall. He didn’t appear very drunk when he delivered the knocking at the door scene and the humour was played down. I thought this worked well for this production but I feel that if you’re playing down the humour you may as well cut the effects of alcohol section; I don’t think most people in the audience noticed it.
The end of the play and the crowning of Malcolm worked really well and I loved the way Fleance was woven into it.
The evening ended very abruptly however, with only one curtain call. The play was very well received by the audience and I don’t think it is unreasonable for the actors to make more than one appearance to make their bow, particularly as the play finished before 10pm. It felt a little mean and discourteous of the cast to not allow the audience to show their appreciation of the play.
Overall, I still don’t think I’ve found my definitive Macbeth but I do think I have found a measuring stick for other productions to live up to.