A long title for today’s post and a very long day driving down to Stratford, watching two plays in a day and driving back again!
I haven’t read any of the three books these plays are based on although I have read some of Robert Harris’ books and have one sitting in my pile of books to read. I also don’t know that much about ancient Rome, other than what I’ve learned from seeing Shakespeare’s Roman plays, so this felt like an adventure into the unknown.
Rather than being two definite plays these are more like two lots of three “playlets” each covering a chapter in the life of Cicero.
The first play starts with Cicero coming to power as Consul, unusual in that he is a self-made man, and trying to reinstil the old values of the Republic into the populace. Julius Caesar, Catiline and Crassus are plotting against him.
The second segment of play I covers Catiline’s uprising and Cicero’s handling of the crisis, ending with Cicero passing death sentence on some of the conspirators but sparing Caesar.
The final segment is entitled Clodius. Clodius is a friend of Cicero who commits an act of sacrilege against the Vestal Virgins. Knowing him to be guilty Cicero refuses to defend him. He manages to get acquitted and swears revenge on Cicero. Cicero is then inveigled into defending Hybrida and ends up being accused himself. Cicero is forced to seek Caesar’s protection.
Play II covers the more familiar territory of Caesar, Mark Antony and Octavian as seen in Shakespeare’s plays Julius Caesar and Antony and Cleopatra, but seen from the perspective of Cicero whose star is fading but who is still a pawn in the power politics of the era.
I enjoyed the plays and learning something more about ancient Rome; I shall need to look out a book on the Roman Empire, if anyone can recommend one.
I thought Richard McCabe did an amazing job of portraying Cicero from new Consul to old relic on the sidelines. He must have been exhausted by the end of the day having been in pretty well every scene of the two plays.
Peter De Jersey did a good job a Caesar, seemingly rational with bits of megalomania peeping out in the early stages.
Joe Dixon was a bit bonkers in play I as Catiline – some definite scenery chewing going on! – but made an interesting Mark Antony in play II.
I thought the women actors were woefully under used. All the female parts were very small and either harpies or floozies. I know ancient Rome was a male dominated society but there are enough examples of women wielding high levels of influence and power in this period to have given an actor of the stature of Siobhan Redmond something more to do!
I loved the stage set for the plays. It was simple, dramatic and flexible. It was also slightly disconcerting to have no actual stage and to have to remember to keep your feet tucked in so you didn’t trip up an actor as they walked past.
One thing I wasn’t sure about was the globe hung above the stage. I guess the colour changes represented the changing influences of the planets but it wasn’t obvious and sometimes the patterns playing on its surface were a distraction. The small boy sitting next to me during the second play was clearly confused by it and kept asking his Dad what it was for. Dad didn’t have an answer.
I also thought the costume department did a great job. Sitting so close to the front we got a close up of the level of detail that went into each costume and into making each character look different.
And, as an extra bonus, the lovely staff of the RSC had spotted that it was the 100th performance we had attended and stood us a drink. Thank you.
Overall, I’m pleased we went to see these two plays. It will be a long time before we see two plays in one day again – it will take a while for my bum to recover! I learned something about ancient Rome. And these plays won’t head onto my “must see if they ever do them again” list.